Is it syncronicity, schadenfreude, or something else when the Nobel Prize in Economics (which is not really a Nobel Prize at all, but I digress) is awarded for research on how economic policy affects unemployment?
Because, just before I learned of the award, I’d decided to go with one of them fancy-all resume services to see if I could kick up the old documentation and paperwork. I dunno, do you think a rainbow and some unicorns would make the resume look better?
Anyways, back when I used to do more hiring myself than looking for work, I understood innately that employers do a terrible job of selecting candidates for open positions. In fact, I remember reading a paper that said we’d do just as good a job, if not better, if we just put all the resumes we received on the wall, put on a blindfold, and threw a dart. And then hire whomever’s resume got hit by the dart.
The nobel prize touches on that, somehow. The recipient’s work found a certain Goldilocks middle-ground to the job search process, noting that a safety net that provides job-seekers the opportunity to evaluate opportunities without undue pressure (like unemployment insurance) can help them from making rash decisions. But that too much leisure and leeway in the job search process can lead to inefficiency. As always, moderation in everything but moderation itself, I suppose.
Apologies for the long hiatus in postings, I’ll try and keep things a little more up-to-date from now on but suffice to say that both July and August were choc-a-bloc full of commitments to both the job search and the homefront, with not a little overlap between the two. Since last posted, I’ve managed to …
Read More →
September 14, 2010 – 2:08 pm
|
By greg
|
Posted in History
|
Nineteenth-century maritime employment practices bound a ship’s crew to the ship itself. In short, the crew were contracted to provide services to the ship. No ship, no services. No crew. The most visible practical effect of this was that compensation ceased the moment the ship to which you were contracted ceased to exist. In other …
Read More →
From the Business Insider ( http://www.businessinsider.com/paul-krugman-lost-decade-here-we-come-2010-6#ixzz0r7WwyAIl ): Paul Krugman continues to argue that a return to “austerity”–an effort by world governments to reduce the massive deficits that have followed the financial crisis–will bury the global economy. Just as bad, Krugman says, austerity will cause deficits and debt to balloon even more, because tax receipts will …
Read More →
A combination of laziness, inattentiveness, and scheduling conflicts resulted in a critical lack of catfood at home. Normally, we buy all of our pet staples at T&T pet supply (a wonderful place) but the aforementioned issues conspired to redirect me to Kroger on the way home. It wasn’t too bad and a bit fortuitous. I …
Read More →
What’s the nature of professionalism? What does it mean to “act professionally?” My dictionary defines “professional” as one engaged in a specified activity as one’s main paid occupation rather than as a pastime. In other words, the primary definition of “professionalism” is pecuniary. It’s a link with money. Specifically, how to get it and how …
Read More →
You may ask yourself, how do I work this? You may ask yourself, where does that highway lead to? You may ask yourself, am I right, am I wrong? You may ask yourself, well, how did I get here? Talking Heads, Once In A Lifetime Where I am right now I got to nine years …
Read More →
June 14, 2010 – 7:29 am
|
By greg
|
Posted in History
|
“If Jesus came back today, and saw what was going on in his name, he’d never stop throwing up. ” — Max Von Sydow as Frederick, quoting Woody Allen in Hannah and Her Sisters
Read More →
Interesting story on 60 minutes tonight, focusing mostly on the vulnerabilities to national infrastructure such as finance and utility control from cyberattack. The bottom line? Sure we’re vulnerable, but there’s no money to be made in fixing the vulnerabilities — meaning no financial incentives through punitive disincentives. A familiar refrain In the meantime, Aurora:
Read More →
This is what came in the mail yesterday: (click on the image for a bigger version) It’s a little nasty, don’t you think?
Read More →